Oh Look! Two more are down! Somewhere along the way the "official word" of two more men down was posted on the Islanders website at 2:17 pm but unless you had an RSS feed, you missed it. I know I did.
Pock out a month will not leave him much of the regular season to come back for. What will hurt is Streit being out day to day. Is that one day? As in the Panthers game? Or two days as in the entire Florida trip? Or how about out as long as Sean Bergenheim is at "day to day" who has now missed the last seven games.
Maybe they should start investing in cloning so they can have a set of spare parts. Because this is getting just somewhat ridiculous.
It's the annual Dad's Week, and according to someone on XM today they have attributed the concept to Garth Snow.
Um, Garth, this is really going to get you in trouble with the Mothers who have not as of yet been taken someplace warm in the middle of winter for a little "bonding" experience with their sons, and each other. Just bringing it up!!
Showing posts with label Thomas Pock. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Thomas Pock. Show all posts
Wednesday, February 4, 2009
Friday, November 21, 2008
Another Casualty, this one named Nielsen
UPDATE: Mottau suspended two games for elbowing
And they wonder why the Islanders fans fall into conspiracy theories! WTF?
I am not that upset with the 5 - 2 loss to the Devils. I am, however, very upset at the loss of Frans Nielsen who has been doing so well under Scott Gordon recently.
Injury may be part of the game, but inflicted injury is another thing. Of course, this leaves us waiting on pins and needles to see if the NHL will dole out the punishment they claim will be the norm for an elbow to the head by Mike Mottau.
I did not see the hit. I cannot comment on whether or not Frans had his head down, or the look of intent. I can only comment on what I have heard from the League regarding their desire to take a stand on hits to the head.
Well NHL, while I await the determination of how long we will lose Frans for, I will also await a decision on Mottau. If Pock received a five game suspension and the loss of over $17,000 in salary, what will Mottau receive?
This is a question every Islander fan has on their mind tonight. It almost eclipses the thoughts of a game in Buffalo tomorrow.
And they wonder why the Islanders fans fall into conspiracy theories! WTF?
I am not that upset with the 5 - 2 loss to the Devils. I am, however, very upset at the loss of Frans Nielsen who has been doing so well under Scott Gordon recently.
Injury may be part of the game, but inflicted injury is another thing. Of course, this leaves us waiting on pins and needles to see if the NHL will dole out the punishment they claim will be the norm for an elbow to the head by Mike Mottau.
I did not see the hit. I cannot comment on whether or not Frans had his head down, or the look of intent. I can only comment on what I have heard from the League regarding their desire to take a stand on hits to the head.
Well NHL, while I await the determination of how long we will lose Frans for, I will also await a decision on Mottau. If Pock received a five game suspension and the loss of over $17,000 in salary, what will Mottau receive?
This is a question every Islander fan has on their mind tonight. It almost eclipses the thoughts of a game in Buffalo tomorrow.
Friday, November 14, 2008
POCK Marked -- for Five Games 11-14-08
The verdict was in early and the banter started quickly.
"Islanders get screwed again."
"If he wasn't an Islander he would have gotten two games just like ___________ (insert recently suspended NHLer name here.)"
"We always get shafted!."
"This proves the NHL wants to crack down on hits to the head."
"If he got anything less than five, it would have been ludicrous."
And my personal favorite.
"Campbell did us a favor, Pock sucks."
Whenever a decision is rendered there will always be two camps; two sides to every story no matter how many camera angles you can watch.
The truth of the matter is the league does indeed want to crack down on hits to the head, especially when they are intentional. Well, it seems that "intent" may have been the deciding factor. How it "looked" to those making the decision is what garnered Mr. Pock a five game suspension and more than $17,000 in fines. The league believes if they hand these types of suspensions down, it will make them less prevalent. We'll see.
And as an aside, I'm a little surprised about Melrose being let go by Tampa. It's sad actually, I'm sure he bought an entire new lighter weight wardrobe for FLA. Shame shame, but he, unlike Neil Smith, is highly employable. Even in this job market.
Ladies and Gentleman, the Circus has moved to Tampa. I believe it has an extended engagement. Sorry about that Dr. David.
The Islanders take on Ottawa again tomorrow night and have the premier of their new (old) pre-game show. I hope that every Islander fan watches it so that Cablevision can see the ratings are not abysmal. Now, just leave it alone please!
See you tomorrow all!
"Islanders get screwed again."
"If he wasn't an Islander he would have gotten two games just like ___________ (insert recently suspended NHLer name here.)"
"We always get shafted!."
"This proves the NHL wants to crack down on hits to the head."
"If he got anything less than five, it would have been ludicrous."
And my personal favorite.
"Campbell did us a favor, Pock sucks."
Whenever a decision is rendered there will always be two camps; two sides to every story no matter how many camera angles you can watch.
The truth of the matter is the league does indeed want to crack down on hits to the head, especially when they are intentional. Well, it seems that "intent" may have been the deciding factor. How it "looked" to those making the decision is what garnered Mr. Pock a five game suspension and more than $17,000 in fines. The league believes if they hand these types of suspensions down, it will make them less prevalent. We'll see.
And as an aside, I'm a little surprised about Melrose being let go by Tampa. It's sad actually, I'm sure he bought an entire new lighter weight wardrobe for FLA. Shame shame, but he, unlike Neil Smith, is highly employable. Even in this job market.
Ladies and Gentleman, the Circus has moved to Tampa. I believe it has an extended engagement. Sorry about that Dr. David.
The Islanders take on Ottawa again tomorrow night and have the premier of their new (old) pre-game show. I hope that every Islander fan watches it so that Cablevision can see the ratings are not abysmal. Now, just leave it alone please!
See you tomorrow all!
Tuesday, September 30, 2008
Hockey Injuries: What's wrong with this picture?
Is it the NHL’s new Injury Policy or the Injuries themselves that are the problem?
I listened to XM’s Home Ice all day for the last few days. For some reason, I could not turn it off. Many of the commentators were talking about the amount of injuries that are already being “reported,” or not reported, as the case may be.
I’m less concerned about being able to get the details of the injuries and more concerned with the occurrence. There are too many. I tried to piece together the injuries on other teams, but couldn’t get past just four days worth of NHL.com headlines. I gave up.
Let’s suffice it to say that we are not the only club who is experiencing injuries, but it may seem that way since some of the injuries hinted at concern players that had injuries last season. I’m thinking Jon Sim is saying a novena in his stall every day he hits the ice. He lost an entire year of his career because of injury. I’m certain he doesn’t want a repeat performance. He played less than two full games last season.
Chris Campoli, although reported from Ice Works that “he seemed okay,” and “didn’t seem depressed” has GOT to be thinking “Oh No! Not again.”
However, the most telling quote about the situation comes from Greg Logan’s Newsday article today direct from Scott Gordon:
"I was taken aback by the amount of hip flexor and groin issues because it never was an issue for me before. It seemed to really target the guys who were here last year.”
Ya think?
How many times did I say aloud “I hope Teddy skates them till they puke!” after a horrendous loss? I was not being sadistic, it is just a Herb Brooks reference to work them beyond their limits and turn them into winners. Guess what? Ted never did. He could never channel Herb Brooks and that level of intensity. I think Gordon is going to try, and he's going to have his hands full.
Hockey is no longer a game for the unfit. Twenty-five years ago hockey was played by men who spent their summers working on farms, drinking beer and eating pizza. Now they spend their summers hitting the gym and making sure, they come to camp in September in better shape than they did the last September. Maybe they are just expecting too much from the human body and from modern science.
But are the players taking training just a bit too far? Can it be that all the summer training is breaking down their bodies rather than building them up? This is really the debate at hand. Hockey is grueling. The schedule doesn’t leave much time for a body to heal. Should they really only be taking a few weeks off, if they do that at all? We could explain away the injuries by saying “it’s a young man’s game.” We could, if it were only the seasoned vets hobbling out of training camp. It’s not.
Also in Logan's article, according to Gordon, it’s not anyone’s fault.
“It’s just a different style. The guys that weren’t here last year were better able to handle the type of practices we had.”
Uh… Sorry. THAT sounds like that COULD be someone’s fault.So what’s wrong here? The players? The training? The trainers? The doctors? The policy? Uh… all of the above? Maybe we expect too much from the human body. How many players had multiple operations at the end of last season? Yet we’re supposed to believe they should be 100% in a matter of weeks. Is that humanly possible? I had one operation in my life and the scar tissue bothered me for over a year. I would wince in pain every time it rained. (Weird, but true.)
Are the players taking training just a bit too far? Can it be that all the summer training is breaking down their bodies rather than building them up? This is really the debate at hand. Hockey is grueling. The schedule doesn’t leave much time for a body to heal. Should they really only be taking a few weeks off, if they do that at all? We could explain away the injuries by saying “it’s a young man’s game.” We could, if it were only the seasoned vets who are hobbling out of training camp. It’s not.
Maybe they push themselves too hard because they know with only a little over 700 jobs in the league, there is always someone waiting in the wings to take their place. On Monday afternoon, one of those waiting in the wings was one Thomas Pock. Moreover, he has a one-way contract.
For some reason, the phrase “TAG! You’re IT!” comes to mind. By the end of last season, I wasn’t even sure who was on the ice. The Bridgeport connection was playing four and five back-to-back games. They didn’t even know where they were going. It’s not even October yet. We may be starting the same way we ended.
Maybe we should focus on the problem and not the policy.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
